Could anyone please explain the ungrammatical use of the above moniker. So much concern about political correctness, while this gross breach of grammatical correctness is used daily, unchallenged.
If such a neuter gender could be a mother, where is the father and the infant, as nothing can be a mother without evidence of both?
Why imply that any mother would inflict such misery on innocent people as have natural calamaties close to us.
Floods, fires, earthquakes, volcanos, tsunamis and all associated sorrow, grief and misery. Who would want to be a mother to be so accused?
John Seip
Gympie
Mother Nature
Digital Edition
Subscribe
Get an all ACCESS PASS to the News and your Digital Edition with an online subscription
Buyers competing for limited livestock
Main livestock numbers were reduced this week with 1244 head of cattle finding their way into the market and 1389 head of sheep and...








